翻訳と辞書 Words near each other ・ Jonetani Kaukimoce ・ Jonetani Ralulu ・ Jonetani Ratu ・ Jonette Engan ・ Joneydabad ・ Jonezen ・ Jones Township, Elk County, Pennsylvania ・ Jones Tract ・ Jones v Kaney ・ Jones v Kernott ・ Jones v Lipman ・ Jones v Lock ・ Jones v New Brunswick (AG) ・ Jones v Padavatton ・ Jones v Post Office ・ Jones v University of Manchester ・ Jones v. Alfred H. Mayer Co. ・ Jones v. Bock ・ Jones v. City of Opelika (1942) ・ Jones v. Cunningham ・ Jones v. Dirty World Entertainment Recordings LLC ・ Jones v. Flowers ・ Jones v. Harris Associates ・ Jones v. North Carolina Prisoners' Labor Union ・ Jones v. Racetrac Petroleum Inc. ・ Jones v. United States ・ Jones v. United States (1983) ・ Jones v. United States (1999) ・ Jones v. Van Zandt ・ Jones Valley Dictionary Lists mini英和辞書 mini和英辞書 Webster 1913 Latin-English FOLDOC Wikipedia English ウィキペディア

翻訳と辞書　辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ] スポンサード リンク Jones v University of Manchester ： ウィキペディア英語版 Jones v University of Manchester ''Jones v University of Manchester'' () ICR 474 is a leading discrimination case relevant for UK labour law, concerning the test for justification of indirect discrimination. ==Facts== A 44-year-old women claimed she was discriminated against on grounds of sex. She was turned down for a job limited to graduates aged 27 to 35. She got her degree as a mature student. The University argued that the limit was justified because careers advisers should be ‘not too far removed in age from the students’ and because they wanted to achieve a spread in age groups, which were 63, 62, 54, 47, 45 and 42 at the time. Tribunal held the pool for comparison was men and women who got degrees when they were aged 25 or over. There were fewer women under age 35 that got degrees than men. Therefore Ms Jones won. It said that the university also lost on justification. The Employment Appeal Tribunal held (following ''Perera'' on the absolute bar approach) that the pool had been artificially restricted, and on justification it had ‘effectively dismissed the matters relied upon by (University ) once it was demonstrated that they were not essential.’ 抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』 ■ウィキペディアで「Jones v University of Manchester」の詳細全文を読む スポンサード リンク 翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.